Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Divorce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that sufficient sourcing exists to show notability Nosebagbear (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Divorce[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable group. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The band name makes it difficult to find sources, but the AllMusic refs are all I could find as well. Any charting? Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lolol "SHiPS has not released a full-length album yet, but a 5-song EP is available for purchase on their MySpace page for $5." I found some routine local coverage of when they played in local venues [1], but WP:AUD applies. Albums release on a non-notable label is not enough for notability. Also recommend deleting The Gifted Program. Reywas92^Talk 08:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know who Ships are but The Divorce have released two full length albums and WP:AUD only applies to companies and organisations not music groups, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm acknowledging my conflict of interest as member of the band and a subject of this article. I'm not super-clear how to engage in this, but I've updated the page to more-extensively cite sources, as well as call out the associations with more-notable international acts in order to better comply with WP:AUD. Paleblinds (talk) 20:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has reliable sources coverage including AllMusic bio and review, coverage in The Stranger (newspaper) and The Seattle Times added to the article since it was listed so passes WP:GNG, imv. Also, the album pages can be redirected if not notable, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- AllMusic bio: [2] and review of their albums there [3] and [4]. Local coverage in The Stranger ([5][6], short entry not listed) and Seattle Times: [7]. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the rationale of Atlantic306. Passes WP:GNG Non-trivial coverage. WP:PRESERVE Lightburst (talk) 16:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP There are reliable sources in article for establishing notability of subject. مضحرالعجایب (talk) 18:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly passes WP:GNG. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.