Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Death Cure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Death Cure[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. Article consists almost entirely of an overextended summary, which may be plagiarized from elsewhere on the Internet, though I haven't been able to pin down which is the original source. — Bdb484 (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: It turns out the summary was plagiarized from another website, so I've pulled it down. — Bdb484 (talk) 22:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could nom please state the grounds for nomination? Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added above. Not sure how I forgot that. Thanks. — Bdb484 (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I dug a little about the copyvio concerns. If you're referring to this wikia entry then it looks like they copied our synopsis rather than the other way around. (Synopsis was added to the wikia on July 10, 2012, but existed on WP as of July 3, 2012.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found two reviews: [1] and [2]. There might be more, but I'm not sure. The Google News archive doesn't seem to be working. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I had some serious issues finding sources due to a similar issue with Google News. There may be more out there that is lost in the swamp of non-usable reviews and link that come up in a general Google search, but I managed to find just enough for this to pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep': I hadn't found those sources, but if they're there, I'm happy to withdraw the nomination. — Bdb484 (talk) 03:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.