Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Deadlines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 04:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Deadlines[edit]

The Deadlines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They are not notable in the least. A standard google test doesn't work, but if you search for the band's name and its lead singer, you'll get barely over 100 hits, and not one notable publication/3rd party source. All the hits are either (1) social media and video links, (2) mirrors and spam websites sites with information from this Wikipedia article, or (3) questionable unreliable sources. The article's talk page includes an admission that the lead vocalist was the main editor of this article which is probably the only reason why it exists at all. Feedback 00:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete at best for now as I'm not finding anything convincingly better aside from 1 music encyclopedia, simply nothing else better. SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Two albums on Tooth & Nail arguably gives a pass of WP:NMUSIC. I didn't find a lot of coverage but there is a bio and review at Allmusic, and a couple of reviews on crossrhythms.co.uk. --Michig (talk) 08:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC) The band also has an entry in Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music ([1]). --Michig (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 02:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.