Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Current Sea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sarah Zucker. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Current Sea[edit]

The Current Sea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable advertising for non-notable advertising consultancy. Apparent coi. DGG ( talk ) 21:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as non-notable spam. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Sarah Zucker. Zucker is an artist who makes lots of animated gifs. The "consultancy" is a joke. She's not advertising anything. If the creator has a CoI, they're astonishingly uninformed about the subject. The more likely explanation is that they attended an edit-a-thon in 2016 and tried to make an article about something they were interested in, but have not stuck around long enough to learn how to do it properly. Vexations (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had not noticed the individual also had an article. A merge is fine with me. DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Sarah Zucker, it's already mentioned there and there is nothing of substance to merge. I'm not really sure if Zucker is notable either but she appears to be more notable than her company, so this seems fine for now. Spicy (talk) 02:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Sarah Zucker per Spicy. The company doesn't seem to be notable on its own. Worldlywise (talk) 02:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.