Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cuckold (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 16:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Cuckold (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no reliable sources. The only link in the article is dead and local. According to the article, this has only been shown in private screenings. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 02:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well... now that the years have gone by, the one cite deadklink IS available through the Buffalo News archive pay to read. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per failing WP:NF. The project was filmed, has had private screenings, and had some minimal coverage... but for a film lacking distribution, itself lacks the significant coverage needed to pass the applicable guideline. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Faint coverage. Fails WP:NF and WP:GNG. Still seems to be going the festival route, so it's possible it could become notable. If and when that happens, we should have the article back, but not until then. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - So far it has only been shown in private screenings, however there are plans to send it to the Sundance, Tribeca, and Toronto film festivals among others. - Try again when that happens and there are published reviews about the events. Carrite (talk) 03:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.