Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Council on Quality and Leadership
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No Consensus leaning towards keep after cleanup by DGG. Davewild (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Council on Quality and Leadership[edit]
- The Council on Quality and Leadership (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete as blatant advertising Mayalld (talk) 16:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam/COI case, per the creator on the talk page: "We followed the same writing style as The Joint Commission and AAIDD which are closely related to us. We purposefully left out our marketing language." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs spam removed, but this is possible. The organization is in fact notable and the references are real. Deletion is the last resort, after editing fails. COI is only a reason for careful checking and pruning.DGG (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it does seem notable, per the article's references, but I recommend gutting it of the advertising-like content. Slideshow Bob (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 13:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I removed some of the spam and excessive emphasis, but there is still some duplication to be removed. Probably should be rewritten altogether by someone unconnected with the organization, but it does seem to be notable. DGG (talk) 06:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.