Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Corporate Presence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Corporate Presence[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried to trim down the promotion but the only source I could find that is remotely in-depth would be this one from the Financial Times. Company fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. I left all the promotional content as I didn't want to make it seem like I gutted the information just prior to making the deletion recommendation, but much of the wording would need to be removed. CNMall41 (talk) 21:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and HighKing. Fails the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 13:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.