Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cornell Centrist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep DES ^(talk) 21:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Cornell Centrist[edit]

one year, 2 month old campus student newspaper. entirely non-notable. delete Cornell Rockey 19:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional delete - only if the Cornell Review and Turn Left go too. Otherwise keep. (All three have sections at Cornell University.) Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 21:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cornell University. I see no reason to remove useful information about a newspaper. The articles on other papers can be nominated separately and judged on their own merits. Edison 23:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article. Many people on the Cornell Campus and at other universities are searching for this information as we collaborate on work and learn about other publications. I also see no reason to remove useful information about a newspaper. Don't be so hasty to delete this article. Also, this newspaper was founded in the fall of 2005, so it is nearly two years old. Additionally, the paper has contacts and seeks to develop contacts with numerous, notable politicians. (Jchawla 15:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Note, crystal-ballery about the future of this publication is not a reason to keep per WP:CBALL Cornell Rockey 15:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article. Then let's be consistent and get rid of every single student publication at every single university. Why is this even such a big deal? It's not like the page and its links are clutter -- it's useful for people to have this reference. It seems like you have a personal vendetta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.147.57.6 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.