Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Core Pocket Media Player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability has been apparently established. Could anyone include those reviews in the article? Tone 14:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Core Pocket Media Player[edit]

Fundamental reason to delete is that it fails notability. It is also completely unsourced, as the two blogs used as references are unreliable. The article has had few major edits in the last year so it is unlikely to improve over the next year. The product is discontinued, so it is unlikely to suddenly gain notability or new sources. Cleanup tags for four months have failed to bring improvement. Miami33139 (talk) 21:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. twirligig^{Leave one! ⋄ Check me out!} 21:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on notability grounds.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 21:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as notability is demonstrated by winning Smartphone & Pocket PC Magazine's Best Software Awards in both smartphone and Pocket PC categories in 2005 and 2006. --Paul_012 ^(talk) 05:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment--Link please?--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 10:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I somehow forgot: 2005 Pocket PC Awards, 2005 smartphone Awards, 2006 Pocket PC Awards, 2006 smartphone Awards. This review also describes it as "the best, free multimedia player for both the Pocket PC and the Palm OS platform". --Paul_012 ^(talk) 13:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TCPMP perfectly meets notability guidelines as there are plenty reviews of this software: http://www.smartdevicecentral.com/article/TCPMP+071+Palm+OS/213454_1.aspx, http://www.treocentral.com/content/Stories/760-1.htm, http://justanothermobilemonday.com/Wordpress/2006/10/15/review-coreplayer-corecodec-strikes-back/, http://www.mobile-review.com/soft/2007/core-player-s60.shtml. Netrat (talk) 14:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
!Vote changed to keep: per 4 of the reviews (not Wordpress because it isn't a reliable source). Passes WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep likewise.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 18:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paul_012 et al. decltype 19:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.