Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Convenient Groom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Convenient Groom[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, does not have significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:GNG and WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 15:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just like theatrical films, television films are not automatically entitled to have articles just because their own production studio's self-published directory of their own films technically verifies that the film exists — the notability test is the reception of significant critical attention in the media and/or nominations/wins of notable film or television awards, not just "this topic exists". But there are no notability-supporting reliable sources here, and I'm not finding anything that would bolster the case for inclusion: apart from some bad blogs and corporate press releases, the strongest source I'm finding is a "10 worst Hallmark movies of all time" listicle that gives this film one 90-word blurb of attention, which is not enough all by itself if it's the best we can do. Bearcat (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The film just straight-up fails WP:GNG. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Chompy Ace 00:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.