Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Contrived
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Contrived[edit]
- The Contrived (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Book not yet published, no Google hits, author not on Amazon, WP:N, WP:FUTURE —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Whether or not this is a self-published book or something run through a publisher is somewhat irrelevant, although my reason for pointing this out is because the complete and total lack of Google hits of any sort (other than links to the WP page) hints quite heavily that it's SP. Publishers typically try to have the book listed as early as possible to drum up sales, at least publishers worth their salt would. In any case, there's absolutely nothing out there to show that this book passes or will pass notability guidelines in the near future. If it ever gets enough coverage to pass GNG then it can be re-added, but the sad fact is that the vast majority of books out there DON'T pass notability guidelines and that's even if you're counting the ones that are published by the mainstream publishers. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 14:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no information on this book or author anywhere. The contrived. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.