Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cloth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. L Faraone 00:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Cloth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of the importance of this film. This is a straight to DVD release, not a theatrical release. Fails WP:FILM Gtwfan52 (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the release date, per the article, is July 2. Uberaccount (talk) 03:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. The coverage here is light, but it is just barely enough to make it pass notability guidelines for a small film of this type. We're not going to see coverage for this of Iron Man 3 proportions, but this is just enough for right now. I have no problem with incubating this, though, if there's enough of an argument to say delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Get a life Tokyogirl79. Tokyogirl79 and her little gang are on a personal crusade. She is unbiased and is not the gatekeeper of Wickapidia. A release date is sufficient. Get a job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.65.183 (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why you are arguing with Tokyogirl79 who agrees with you in this case! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Um... ok... you are aware that I was the one who found all of the sources and salvaged the article, right? And besides, a release date is not sufficient to save an article. To show notability we have to show coverage in reliable sources such as news reports about the film, movie reviews, and the like- which I found. Even if I hadn't found the sources and was voting to delete (which I am not), please do not make personal attacks on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The release date is utterly irrelevant, since it wasn't mentioned in the nom. Also, wtf is with the IP's comment? (and what is Wickapidia?). I'd probably lean towards incubating the article myself. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.