Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The City of the Saved

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Faction Paradox. Star Mississippi 13:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The City of the Saved[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional location that displays no individual relevance or notability. No sources seem to exist outside of primary ones, and thus the article doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Literature. Pokelego999 (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to faction paradox Dronebogus (talk) 22:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph notes mentions by the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and the British Fantasy Society -- not sure why those aren't considered sources other than primary? Phil PH (talk) 07:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was admittedly my bad on misreading those sources. I'm not quite sure how I did that, but my apologies. I can't go back and edit my initial nomination, but in this case, the two sources don't constitute SIGCOV, as I couldn't find anything else related to The City of the Saved. Sorry about the confusion in regards to sourcing, but as it stands, I don't believe it meets SIGCOV or GNG. Pokelego999 (talk) 18:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Faction Paradox. A simple reading of the Encyclopedia source shows it is not actually about the article subject, while the book review is not about the article subject either. This is solely minor plotcruft, belonging in FANDOM. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources appear to be WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs and fall short of WP:SIGCOV. A redirect is a valid WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.