Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Change Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted as G12 (copyright violation). — Diannaa (talk) 04:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Change Project[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Advertorially-toned article about an organization, referenced only to a single entry on the White House blog rather than to any reliable source coverage about it in media. And even that blog entry mostly comprises first-person commentary blurbs by people associated with the group -- so even if we accepted the White House as a valid source because White House, the content of the entry still tilts toward primary sourcing. Something like this might be eligible for an article if it could be written neutrally and sourced over WP:GNG, but Wikipedia does not grant an exemption from our content rules to non-profit organizations just because they do admirable work -- we're an encyclopedia, not a free public relations platform. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source something better -- but this isn't appropriate for inclusion in this form. Bearcat (talk) 16:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Tagged {{db-g12}} COPYVIO of organization's main page. Jbh ^Talk 05:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.