Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Campbell Times

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice towards having a merge discussion elsewhere. Kurykh (talk) 02:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Campbell Times[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small-ish bi-weekly student paper. Best of Show at a statewide CMA competition was the best I could find.[1] Mark Schierbecker (talk) 17:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Campbell University#The Campbell Times, where the additional detail about the paper's history and circulation will be a positive addition. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per the rationale of Arxiloxos above. A valid WP:ATD-M. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We keep university newspapers just as we keep small town newspapers and small defunct newspapers, because, as User:doncram states at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The University Register, "it is a lot like how we are a gazetteer for places, these are places that are sources."E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I did say what E.M.Gregory quotes. It does seem to me that newspapers are fundamental elements of an encyclopedia, the atoms that we rely upon for everything else. We are a "gazetteer" about places, basically willing to cover most places that have any sourcing about them, and newspapers are even more basic. Here, with The Campbell Times, we have a newspaper that lived just two years, but it is a source, and currently we know about it from this article that someone went through the bother of figuring out, and it should be kept. --do ncr am 19:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note, the suggestion above that it could be merged to Campbell University#The Campbell Times is reasonable on its face, but in fact the article is too long already to merge back. One sentence in the University article is about right. It is reasonable to split out the newspaper article as too much material for the university. It is four sentences plus some information in the infobox and in categories/links; it is a reasonable editorial decision to split it out. It is also too much information already to be merged into a list of defunct newspapers in the state. --do ncr am 19:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.