Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bubble (2013 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bubble (2013 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:CRYSTAL. Resources for this upcoming film are heavily based on one primary source. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This NYTimes piece is solely about the book, and regardless of its fame, the film does not get to reap the benefits. The others are primaries. I can find no news sources providing any coverage of this film. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 19:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Like Jethrobot, I could find no independent reliable sources for this. Nor does the IMDb listing [1] doesn't offer any links to substantive outside coverage either. Even a minor mention in an independent reliable source might be enough to justify a mention of this film project in the article for Meltdown (book) (and perhaps a redirect of some sort as well) but I didn't find anything.--Arxiloxos (talk) 02:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for now. Allow undeletion/recreation back when the film is released and if it gets the requisite coverage to meet WP:NF. Certainly policy allows this topic be spoken of within the articles on Thomas Woods and/or Meltdown until that time. Okay with it being userfied as release approaches. SCHMIDT, ^{Michael Q.} 03:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable upcoming film. SL93 (talk) 03:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of notability per the general notability guidelines. All I can find are passing mentions, both last year and from last March, about this film about to be released. There does not seem to be any traction or significant coverage. Until there is some, it is too premature to have an article on Wikipedia. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to be entirely self-promotion of a project which keeps having its release date delayed and the existence, let alone notability, of which is not demonstrated. SPECIFICO talk 16:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speculation. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.