Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Broken! (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Brokencyde. Mandsford 19:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Broken![edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted following an AfD, and thereafter repeatedly recreated. Sending recreated article back to AfD in case there has been some change in the status of available information that I've missed. bd2412 T 21:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 09:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep? I'm of the opinion that if a band is considered to be notable enough for an article, their released full-length album releases are too by default. This band has gone through deletion a bunch of times, sometimes being deleted and others being kept, so keep for now but with no objection to deletion if the band is found to be non-notable at AFD. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that it is our policy that all full-length albums are notable if the band that released them is notable. In this case, the album is self-released, and no charting or ither indicia of importance is provided. Perhaps it could be merged with the other two stub articles for self-released albums by this band? bd2412 T 20:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Redirect to Brokencyde. Album is non-notable per WP:NALBUMS, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Could be useful redirect. Uncle Dick (talk) 18:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Brokencyde. Not notable enough on its own as its self-releassed and doesn't have the significant coverage we require, but redirects to the artistes article are allowed for in the guidelines for albums. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Brokencyde, as per WP:NALBUMS, which states that: "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." If the redirect is reverted, an admin can always protect the page.--hkr Laozi speak 13:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.