Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bridal Gala™
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Angr (talk • contribs) 12:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Bridal Gala™[edit]
Delete. Deprodded by author without reason. Reads like spam. Link is not functional--Porturology 08:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As above. Wickethewok 08:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advert. --Blue520 08:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advert for nn event. See associated AFDs for Elite Soirée. Kcordina 09:39, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, ad and nn. --Terence Ong 10:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. A mention in Elite Soirée would be more than adequate. -Dawson 18:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advertisment as with the two related articles I just voted on. Company founder is 24, so it may not amount to much yet despite all the hype. Golfcam 23:33, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note this has been incorrectly put up for a second AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bridal Gala™ (second nomination)) while this discussion is still open, could the admin that closes this discussion please also the second one as well.--Blue520 11:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per all of the above. The (tm) doesn't help, either. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 12:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per AOTA. Andy Saunders 13:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per AOTA. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 13:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above, and we never use trademark symbols like that. -- Mithent 14:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete™, non-notable outside of Elite Soirée, which should likely go as well per its AfD. --Kinu t/c 20:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.