Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Book of the Die

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 01:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Book of the Die[edit]

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 19:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: insufficient 3rd party verification. JamesBurns (talk) 02:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 23:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Luke Rhinehart. Author is notable; brief summary of book should be moved there. I don't understand the comment on 'verification': the book is published. Martin (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, just ignore him, he always says that. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 06:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Luke Rhinehart. While it was an easy task finding third party verification for the book, like this mention at the BBC.co.uk, or The Independent, none of them provide any stand alone notability for the book. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 06:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

merge to Luke Rhinehart - author and some of his other works are very well known/ cult classics- not this one. Sticky Parkin 21:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.