Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bobby D Show
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 07:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Bobby D Show[edit]
- The Bobby D Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod removed by SPA (Bobbydradio (talk · contribs)) and replaced with a disclaimer. No reliable sources given or found to establish notability of a small-time radio show. Even Google sees a show in Florida as being a better match. tedder (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the content, lack of notability, and the page's author all just convince me that this is an attempt to use Wikipedia for advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redlock (talk • contribs) 00:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No references, and it does seem to be trying to advertise. Endofskull (talk) 00:36, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable show in an incredibly non-notable market. Nate • (chatter) 05:36, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: 21 Google hits, mostly social networking with the others being advertising. For notability to be likely, there would have to be at least a few news sources in the hits. —EncMstr (talk) 16:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Unreferenced, poorly written article not especially notable and with a biased tone. Jsayre64 (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.