Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Boathouse Putney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Boathouse Putney[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not an obviously notable pub. I had a look at Historic England to see if there were any related Grade II related buildings (which is common for a lot of London pubs), but couldn't find anything for this one. A search for "Brewhouse Lane, Putney" also came up with a blank. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources in the article and sources from my Google searches do not pass WP:GNG. I found various problems with potential sources including primary, self-published, and lack of significant coverage. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's nothing notable in this whatsoever. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Frankly, considering how common Grade II listed buildings are, not having one almost seems like a contraindication for pub notability. It looks like the soi-disant notability claim here is being opened by an Olympic sportsman, and that's WP:NOTINHERITED by even the most liberal reading. Vaticidalprophet 12:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It's just a pub. 81.131.132.199 (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable, agree with above voters. Lesliechin1 (talk) 08:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.