Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blood of the Hungarians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Albert Camus. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Blood of the Hungarians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was published in 1957, not in the US. Author died in 1960, which would put into the public domain in 2055 under normal circumstances. No evidence that the document has been released to the public domain, or that it can be reprinted in full as "fair use".

Possible to delete as "copyvio" though may be fairer to discuss as AFD. billinghurst sDrewth 13:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Perhaps this can be reverted to earlier stub form [1], thus removing copyright concerns. It can then be expanded with sources, or redirected to Camus article. JNW (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any indication this has received widespread coverage? If we can't have the text (which would go on Wikisource anyways, if copyright permitted it), and there's no independent reliable sources which discuss the text, we really can't do much but mention it in another article, can we? Jclemens (talk) 17:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I agree with Jclemens here. If there is material on coverage on the text, it can be added. The copyvio quote can be removed right anyway. --Soman (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 00:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Albert Camus. I was unable to find any extensive coverage of this outside of direct copies of the speech. Mauler90 _talk 18:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.