Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blah! Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Captain Sensible#Politics. czar  22:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Blah! Party[edit]

The Blah! Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely meets any Wikipedia policy on notability, and as a political party, fails to have any significance or notability either 'in real life' or to satisfy Wiki policies. doktorb wordsdeeds 09:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Have to disagree on this one. The connection with Captain Sensible and all the sources in the article suggests it meets WP:GNG. Now to dig out some albums by The Damned. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Captain Sensible#Politics, where a lot of this content is already duplicated. Most of the coverage I found focuses on the Captain and unless it becomes more notable it can easily be accommodated there. --Michig (talk) 11:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect to Captain Sensible#Politics per rationale of Michig. The Party seems to be intrinsically connected to Captain Sensible, no clear indication of notability in its own right.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 18:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.