Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bierton Crisis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bierton Crisis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published book with no secondary coverage; fails WP:NB. Article created by author. Blackguard 02:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The author of the book and this article may mention it in Draft:Bierton Strict and Particular Baptists which may get accepted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NBOOKS. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)--— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- At best this is privately self-published; at worst it is an unpublihsed typescript, of which the author has given copies to the copyright libraries (whether they want it or not!). Peterkingiron (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication it meets even one of the criteria in WP:NBOOK. I am One of Many (talk) 05:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.