Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Betoota Advocate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 00:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Betoota Advocate[edit]

The Betoota Advocate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mess of an article (part-hoax?) on a satire website that doesn't seem notable. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 15:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The only reliable source coverage I could find was the ABC Mediawatch transcript of the story that Channel 9's Today Show fell for. That's not enough for the GNG which, for good reason, requires in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 00:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can't see any significant ongoing coverage by anyone. Its not notable. - Shiftchange (talk) 17:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.