Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beautiful Miscellaneous
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Beautiful Miscellaneous[edit]
- The Beautiful Miscellaneous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prod tag removed without any improvement to the article, which doesn't meet WP:NFF as a film that seems to have not yet been produced; no reliable sources, no assertion of notability, etc. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - IMDb says only "in development" for 2010, fails WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. According to The Hollywood Reporter on June 5, 2008, the book was optioned to be developed into a feature film. This is not at all close to production; studios option many, many rights for possible films, but not all of them actually enter production. My suggestion would be to instead create an article about the book and include a sentence, using the THR citation, mentioning that the book was optioned. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The notability guidelines for future films stipulates that a stand-alone article should not be created until a project enters production. This is because many factors such as budget issues, scripting issues, and casting issues can interfere with the project. This project is not even in preproduction, and anything could happen before it is. The article can be recreated when, or if, principal photography begins. Steve T • C 23:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.