Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Audibles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Audibles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable secondary sources. A google search doesn't reveal any reliable secondary sources considering their suposibly producing for major artists. STATic message me! 19:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —STATic message me! 19:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possible hoax or exaggeration. For example, the article claims they're best known for a "hit single" called "Girl I Got You". We have an article for the album on which that song appears (We Are Young Money), which indicates that song wasn't released as a single. Hmm. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 01:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE Unreferenced puffery that doesn't appear to get over the WP:ARTIST level. Hasteur (talk) 21:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.