Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (soundtrack)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was kept. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 23:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (soundtrack)[edit]

No proof that this is real Basketball 110 _{what famous people say} 23:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep or Merge the 'article' is a mess but the soundtrack apparently exists. Merge to movie? I don't know the policy on soundtracks. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 23:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's real, and although I haven't done an in depth survey of all coverage (it's late), it would be difficult to imagine a music project in which Nick Cave was involved that didn't pass notability guidelines. The article does require some clean up, however. --Sturm 23:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with movie. Basketball110 _{what famous people say} 23:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per new info. Basketball 110 _{what famous people say} 23:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without merging. The music of this film is not popularized beyond the scope of the film itself. It would be a better approach to cover composition of the music in the film article's Production section and any opinion about the music in the Critical reaction section (if it was a much-noticed element). A mere track listing is not encyclopedic here, especially considering that the individual songs lack notability on their own, too. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per added reviews; looks like the soundtrack's more important than I realized. Article could use some fleshing out beyond the track listing, though. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 12:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Merge with the film's article. Hazillow (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect The only thing worth saving is the mention that Nick Cave worked on the soundtrack. If you can fit that in with the film article, feel free. -Freekee (talk) 04:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with film article The Dominator (talk) 04:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nick Cave is a major artist and this is his latest album-length release. I've seen several reviews of it and articles about it so it meets the interpretation of WP:N at WP:MUSIC. --Nick Dowling (talk) 07:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've just added three reviews of the album, all of which attest that this is a Nick Cave album. The nominator probably should have dug around for a bit longer before labeling this album a hoax - while it's hard to find references on Google as it has the same name as the movie, it does appear on many (but not all) major music websites. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 09:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Soundtrack albums are just as inherently notable as other widely available album releases, and the fact this is a Nick Cave release makes it all the more notable. 23skidoo (talk) 15:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- legitimate release from a notable artist. - Longhair\^talk 03:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nomination rationale is that this is unverifiable – it clearly is. There is not consensus that film soundtracks, particularly ones that are not a compilation of songs, are not notable on their own merit. --Canley (talk) 04:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, there is plenty of proof that this is real, and as a Nick Cave release it's certainly notable as well. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per Sturm & 23skidoo. tomasz. 19:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.