Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Angels' Greatest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 16:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Angels' Greatest[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issues. Probably did not chart. Editor keeps creating articles and including company info Jennica✿ / ^talk 16:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reached No. 5 on the Kent Music Report, ref now added.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep satisfies WP:NMUSIC in that it is a charting record. Dan arndt (talk) 05:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep at the risk of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, well it does, that is no more notable than this. Just scrapes in I think (against the current standards). Aoziwe (talk) 12:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:NMUSIC because it charted. Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.