Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheSteamTeam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Doc James. Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G5, G11 (non-admin closure) — TheMagnificentist 09:55, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TheSteamTeam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company that doesn't meet GNG, sources are press releases and was created by SPA whose first edits are to game the system and get autoconfirmed. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:00, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG, references fail criteria for establishing notability WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 13:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.