Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheKompany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TheKompany[edit]

This page should remain up as a warning. TheKompany.com was found guilty, along with it's subsidiary companies, Progrock Records and Mindawn of copyright infringement in United States Federal Court Case number SACV 09-00195-JVS (ANx)in 2013. The removal of this page would give cover and allow others to be harmed by dishonest business practices. The case is of public record and should remain available for the protection of the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.55.181 (talk) 12:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 00:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to KDE with redirect. Regardless of whether TheKompany is notable or not, it is only known for K Desktop Envirement. The current KDE article serves as a catchall for KDE community-related items, so the scope of TheKompany article lies within the scope of KDE. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Σ τ c. 01:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.