Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The-Slackers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The-Slackers[edit]

Delete. Non-notable webcomic with no Alexa data. Article itself states that it is new and "gaining readership very slowly". Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. ... discospinster _talk 15:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I change my vote to Strong Keep if they agree to make me a mod on their forums. My Alt Account 15:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable webcomic. NawlinWiki 17:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. JPG-GR 17:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per article. "fairly recent diary-style webcomic that follows many of the standard clichés ... gaining readership very slowly." No sign of reputable, third-party reliable sources. -- Dragonfiend 16:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, its complete crap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.65.37.101 (talk • contribs)
Strong Keep, why delete it? We have a growing readerbase, and I see smaller webcomics getting their own Wikipedia pages. This comic is very important to me, it's something to call my own. I'll take off the "gaining readership slowly" section, but at least let us keep the page up.Slackerone 12:58, 15 September 2006
Delete - As per above. Please please please delete the "smaller webcomics" as well. - Hahnch e n 23:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.