Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's Mandarin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's Mandarin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be an unremarkable language school and the article makes no claims to notability, failing to meet WP:GNG. It is clearly a business, rather than a public educational establishment, and should therefore meet WP:NCORP, which it fails to do. Iamchinahand (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I request that the following article also be deleted:

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Iamchinahand (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Iamchinahand (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Iamchinahand (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - non-notable company. The article has already been deleted twice, most recently by Jimfbleak two months ago. -Zanhe (talk) 05:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as noted, I've speedied this spam twice, but a G11 has just been declined so let's nail this then saltJimfbleak - talk to me? 06:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article makes no claims as to why this particular training business is notable over and above the many others which exist. Searches find promotional stuff and some run-of-the-mill mentions but nothing in-depth. Fails WP:NCORP. Neiltonks (talk) 11:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete - non-notable school. - MA Javadi (talk) 21:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - This is a re-creation of a deleted article with nothing in it indicating notability. Nothing was found in my WP:BEFORE indicating notability. Appears to be a purely WP:PROMO article and as such should have been speedied under WP:G11. Has already been recreated (and I speedied the recreation under G11) so there's lots of indicia that the editor creating this is not here to build an encyclopedia. FOARP (talk) 11:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I declined the speedy at Sidaorui and request that it be added to the AfD. @Iamchinahand: Feel free to undo if you think they shouldn't be considered together.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Surely a re-creation of an already-WP:SNOW deletion should be a no-brainer for speedy deletion? At any rate, if we're AFD'ing them, can we make sure we put Salt on both to stop re-creations? FOARP (talk) 07:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with FOARP. By re-creating the article under a new title during the AfD process, I think it warrants a speedy delete. I also agree to put salt on both after AfD to stop this bad behavior.(Iamchinahand (talk) 09:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.