Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's God

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a clear consensus that the album is not notable in its own right, and the content has been suitably merged elsewhere. Mkativerata (talk) 06:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's God[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rationale:This article should be deleted because the article fails to comply with WP:NSONGS; song failed to chart, article has insufficient context, no indication of importance or relevance, really no hope of expansion Nowyouseeme talk2me 05:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Nowyouseeme talk2me 06:10, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:57, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Song doesn't have to chart to be notable, yet the song has multiple sources, enough that I'd say is plenty sufficient. CloversMallRat (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note to admins - User:CloversMallRat is the creator of the article. Nowyouseeme talk2me 22:17, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; song failed to chart and doesn't cover as much info on the song as lots of others do. While it does have 5 sources, I still don't think that means it should warrant an article. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 21:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't really need its own article, content can easily be merged into Jo Dee Messina. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Content merged to Jo Dee Messina; not appearing on an album there's no real other merge target. The song is not notable as it didn't chart. If Clovers had his way, nothing would ever be deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Untrue. For one thing, I created this when it was sent out to radio and had a possibility of charting. Likewise, I felt it should remain its own article, because the album its on has yet to be released, so (as you said) it couldn't be merged to that. However, I merged the rest of the info to her artist page. CloversMallRat (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.