Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's All Me

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 18:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's All Me[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Song has no notability, failing the requirments of WP:N and WP:NSONGS. No valid claims and all sources from one site. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Richhoncho (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete didn't chart, sources are no good. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:38, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.