Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thangarasu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thangarasu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is yet another film article that fails badly WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.

Two references send you to YouTube (Watch the movie, currently video is unavailable) and iTune (Listen the soundtrack).

Thanks, Kolma8 (talk) 16:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - falls way short of NFILM and GNG Spiderone 17:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing is not there to justify this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - added some sources. The film links work fine. As discussed in the 100s of articles that this editor has put up - this is no more than a clear example of Wikipedia and its editors' Western bias. The lead cast are all notable actors - and the film marks a significant part of their filmographies. Neutral Fan (talk) 17:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding "some sources." I checked them all and I am not sure though how they add any support for notability of this movie. This one [1] even do not mention the film in question. Do you have any good sources to support "the film marks a significant part of their filmographies"? If you do I'll be the first to keep this article. Also, I am not sure about the "100s of article"; there are surely less than a 100. Kolma8 (talk) 18:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.