Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thamesbank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 23:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thamesbank[edit]

Propaganda piece, almost certainly self-promotion. No references to help us judge their notability. -- RHaworth 05:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - At beginning article appears harmless but later on, the point they are trying to push appears. It appears that the point of this article is to push the point. Delete it. Chris Kreider 12:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A primary concern for Thamesbank is that there is no single body that is collectively responsible for ensuring the sustainability of the River Thames. It is therefore vital that the London Plan and Blue Ribbon Network secure this provision. That's pretty much the thesis statement of the article. Shits all over NPOV. Tractorkingsfan 12:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 12:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advertising, Wikipedia is not a propoganda site. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 13:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like a press release. --Folantin 13:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Violates NPOV] and IMHO WP:NOT#SOAP.SkierRMH 05:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per violation of many rules. --Wizardman 17:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.