Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakur Abha Singh Makwana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. These likely could have been G5'ed Courcelles (talk) 20:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thakur Abha Singh Makwana[edit]

Thakur Abha Singh Makwana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating similar articles together:

The references and the articles don't prove notability. These similar articles are created by different users. NewMutants (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Thakur Roop Singh Makwana. What is going on? --NewMutants (talk) 13:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: More similar pages to these were mentioned by me at Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 11#Indian emperors. 220 of Borg 07:13, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per nom. References are not references and, as said by Yunshui, all the authors have been indef blocked as SP of KingMandhata74. Note: a pair of IPs (106.76.132.100 and 106.78.91.166, possible SP) are tryin' to remove the AFD tags. I reported 'em at WP:AIV. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Yunshui and 220 of Borg: adding Thakur Surajmal Ji created by block evading sock Randyjonn and Thakur Man Singh Ji created by Govteee.

I would request @Hermera34:, @Derek R Bullamore: and @FeanorStar7: who patrol new pages to come here and check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#Indian_emperors

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and restart when better or simply mention them at another article if separate articles can't be made. SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all to make a make an article on Punadra State (unless we have some such already). Indian princes were the equivalent of European nobility and were effectively minor sovereigns. However, such brief stubs are not worth keeping, but redirecting to an article on the dynasty might be appropriate. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.