Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thaddeus Seymour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per #2 Mdann52 (talk) 21:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thaddeus Seymour[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Pizzole (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meets Notability College President, Dean at an Ivy League university - Dartmouth. Note that there is an eensy possibility that the nominator is deliberately nominating many articles started by those who found his favoured article should be deleted. Collect (talk) 18:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Redirect and merge to American Bar Association.(Pizzole (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)) striking bad-faith post here - see all the other AfDs Collect (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW KEEP - retaliatory nomination in bad faith. Might I suggest to the nominator that he withdraw all of the bad faith nominations they have recently made? That would go a long way to re-establishing your good faith on Wikipedia? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 18:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 18:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in good faith for sure. You and Collect, no. You are clearly friends because the one help the other with the AfD nominations. (Pizzole (talk) 18:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I have no article overlap with OneL of any significance whatsoever. OTOH, I recall an SPI investigation where you were the one remaining account. And are you asserting tat you did not just accidentally nominate a slew of articles without notifying the article creators at all -- and you accidentally chose ones who you disagree with at an AfD? Collect (talk) 18:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with your persecution. (Pizzole (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Keep Good Grief! President of a notable college and GNG coverage as well [1]. Voceditenore (talk) 18:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's time to merge the article to the College page. (Pizzole (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

No. He passes the notability guidelines for a stand-alone article. Voceditenore (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems obvious, meets GNG. I wonder if any WP:BEFORE was truly done on this nomination. DES ^(talk) 19:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per snowball clause , subject meets WP:PROF x4 if I can count. Frivolous nomination. AFD is not a weapon to be wielded in personal disputes. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 20:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Inherently notable as a college president, in my view. Meets GNG on top of that. Carrite (talk) 20:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Pizzole (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.