Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tha Rift

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Based on the presentation by User:theleekycauldron, the subject does not meet WP:NMUSICIAN nor WP:GNG at this time.

Thank you everyone for your participation and assuming good faith on this decision. If you have evidence that contradicts this decision and wish to protest, please take it to Deletion Review rather than my talk page. Happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 04:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tha Rift[edit]

Tha Rift (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Tha Rift meets notability number 5 as he was signed to Rostrum Records while in the trio FREEWIFI. On the label they released the album "connected" and three singles including "Ego," and "Took off." Rostrum is an independent record label that has housed many notable artists such as Mac Miller, Wiz Khalifa, Rich the Kid and Mod Sun. He also meets number 1 under notability with references from LA Weekly, WorldStarHipHop, Complex Magazine, and AllHipHop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kayleyrae319 (talkcontribs) 22:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis:

Source assessment table: prepared by User:theleekycauldron
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://allhiphop.com/features/tha-rift-talks-can-you-hear-us-now-inspired-by-george-floyd-daunte-wright/ No Interview with subject Yes Not RSP-greenlit, but seems good Yes No
https://open.spotify.com/artist/7fEi8ewyfKEonfDoJtebVt No Primary source No Primary source No Just for statistics No
https://mrhollywoodmagazine.com/tha-rift/ Yes ~ not particularly reputable, not convinced it's reliable, but it's not nothing ~ eh, not much there, but it's something ~ Partial
https://www.sheenmagazine.com/tha-rift-on-his-debut-edm-album-lessons-learned-in-the-music-industry-more/ No Interview with subject ~ not particularly convinced of reliability, but I wouldn't dismiss it Yes No
https://thehollywooddigest.com/tha-rift-and-kash-young-announce-new-single-fiji-water/ Yes No The "sightings" section, as well as the notice to follow their social media accounts, means I'm not brimming with confidence Yes No
https://ventsmagazine.com/2021/03/01/exclusive-interview-with-tha-rift-what-lies-behind-the-music/ No Interview with subject ~ not sold on reliability No Pretty barebones No
http://voyagela.com/interview/meet-trevor-tha-rift-donnelly-tha-rift-long-beach/ Yes ~ Yes ~ Partial
https://parlemag.com/2018/03/hip-hop-collective-freewifi/ ~ Lots of interview, rest is promotional No absolutely promotional Yes No
https://hiphopsince1987.com/2017/videos/freewifi-ego-video/ Yes No seems promotional No no significant coverage of tha rift No
https://www.complex.com/pigeons-and-planes/2017/09/freewifi-salsa Yes Yes seems all right No not much in significant coverage No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Source assessment table: prepared by User:theleekycauldron
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.laweekly.com/top-10-artists-you-should-be-following-on-instagram/ No "brand partner content"? No promotional ~ eh, not much No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.