Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tete du boeuf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tete du boeuf[edit]

Nominated for {{prod}} twice by two different users, both times reverted by JJay, who is unlikely to change the state of this article in any way shape or form, and i'm getting tired of it. Delete. — Mar. 29, '06 [02:00] <freakofnur_xture |talk>

Delete per nom. jaco plane 02:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tired of what? Violating prod rules by reprodding? I removed the first prod with a message to transwiki. If it has been transwikied then delete is fine with me. If not keep particularly as your fatigue is not yet a reason for deletion and you have not provided any other argument for the removal of this article. -- JJay 02:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You didn't make much of an effort [1]. I'd be happier if you stopped following my edits, or reverting all {{prod}}s, or whatever it is you do around here. — Mar. 29, '06 [02:32] <freakofnur_xture |talk>
  - Following your edits? Reverting all prods? I'll ignore the last crack, but those are rather serious accusations. Or is that the fatigue talking?-- JJay 03:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Somehow I continue to unwillingly encountering you at every turn. Do you have any better suggestions? — Mar. 29, '06 [03:20] <freakofnur_xture |talk>
  - Try reality since the only article where you ever encountered me was this one, and I edited it before you. I would have also suggested WP:CIV and WP:AGF, but what's the point, you are well beyond that. -- JJay 15:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - - I have a suggestion: take it elsewhere. Please. dbtfz ^talk 03:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. At the very least, pointless. A slang phrase which literally means "head of beef" and is figuratively used to mean ... what? Fan1967 02:13, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ain't nothin' but a dicdef, y'all. Brian G. Crawford 02:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fan1967. Gene Nygaard 02:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Brian Con Dem^Talk 03:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nom L e idi ot 03:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless significantly improved. The article implies that the term is slang for something else, but doesn't say what that something else might be, or assert why the slang term is notable. --Hyperbole 03:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or transwiki as dicdef. dbtfz ^talk 03:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wiktionary. AmiDaniel (Talk) 03:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
{{Move to Wiktionary}} Royboy crashfan 04:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Totally contextless phrase, I'd probably speedy it. Don't transwiki, do we transwiki definitions like "tete du poulet", "tete du merde"? - Hahnchen 04:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear dicdef Gwernol 04:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without purpose...not encyclopedic.--MONGO 04:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Pointless. I know tête du boeuf is bull head, but what's the alleged slang meaning? And even then it would belong in the French Wiktionary. Peter Grey 06:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe it can be used as an insult? I need a few new ones, I'm running out of them. — Mar. 29, '06 [07:15] <freakofnur_xture |talk>

I hadn't thought of insults, but that could work: "Boy, you're really acting like a tete du boeuf." I thought of a few other possibilities, like: "Man, I had 10 margaritas last night and this morning I really have a tete du boeuf." Any number of things it could be used for. Fan1967 16:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as dicdef --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Head of beef" means "head of beef", eh? Fascinating. ProhibitOnions 10:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 10:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, dicdef without the def --Deville (Talk) 11:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per just about everything above. Deizio 16:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete le boeuf per Deville. Sandstein 21:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, do not Transwiki, this is just a French translation of some English words. If there were some discussion of its notability, importance or cultural significance, it might merit an article. But this is without merit. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and don't Transwiki per Zoe. --Khoikhoi 19:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.