Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestMP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TestMP[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quick Google search shows no WP:RSes by the fifth screen page. Only reference on the article is self-published. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:21, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable, reads as advertisement for the software. Couple of line appear clearly copied directly from company sales material. ie You will be able, etc. A7 and/or G11 Caffeyw (talk) 07:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliable sources. SmackoVector (talk) 10:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 03:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete No WP:RS via google, google books or google scholar. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.