Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tesla boy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tesla boy[edit]
- Tesla boy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's not a lot of sources, if at all, to indicate notability; most are just blog sites or deadlinks now, and those aren't reliable. Should be deleted now; until the band gains some notability, it doesn't need its own article. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. The TimeOut Moscow coverage looks good enough, and Google News shows plenty more, mostly in Russian though, so could do with a Rusian reader to judge.--Michig (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article certainly needs improving, but the band does appear to be notable. Apart from the article cited by Michig, here is an article about them[1] in the Russian edition of Rolling Stone, an article about them (in English)[2] in Bearded. Here is a long article[3] about them in "Far from Moscow", which is a kind of a webmagazine at the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures of UCLA. There is also quite a bit of coverage in Russian, e.g. an article about them in the newspaper "Evening Moscow"[4], webmagazine 44100Hz[5], Vladivostok city news[6], etc. Nsk92 (talk) 06:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources establish notability.Steve Dufour (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.