Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tesa Arcilla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Mkativerata (talk) 02:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tesa Arcilla[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journalist. Insufficient coverage about her for inclusion in Wikipedia. Deleted by WP:PROD and then recreated three hours later by Elementalkarl (talk · contribs). One of a very large number of articles created about non-notable TVB personnel by groups of accounts with very similar editing habits. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Fok and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Lin. cab (call) 07:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. cab (call) 07:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as PROD deleter. No indication of notability for a BLP. Jclemens (talk) 16:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer! 04:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note - I haven't done much research but there's a very good chance that this article is a copyright violation. The text can be found here but I didn't investigate as to which came first. OlYeller^Talktome 15:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That site looks like yet another unattributed and not very skillful Wikipedia scraper (you can tell by how they mangle the Chinese characters into extended Latin in the lede). In otherwords, they're violating our copyright, not we theirs. cab (call) 00:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.