Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence J

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tan ǀ 39 23:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terrence J[edit]

Fails WP:BIO; lacks notability with no substantial coverage. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 00:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 16:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – There's a feature article about him: Coleman, Chrisena. "The Hottest 'Nerd' on TV: Star from Queens Seen by Millions Around the World", New York Daily News, 2008-04-15. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 17:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources you added failed to include a link. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 19:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 17:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I tried to establish notability, but couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources [1] [2]. Paul, I can't find the article you name on http://www.nydailynews.com/ — is it available online? --Amalthea^Talk 11:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I found it in my library's database. I've now added it to the article, as well as another article about him from the Greensboro News & Record. I would say there is enough there now to establish WP:N notability. Keep. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK. I can't judge if those articles constitute significant coverage, so I'll just strike my !vote. I still find it weird that there's so little online news coverage available about a current notable pop music show host though. --Amalthea^Talk 23:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article appears well-sourced. I don't see a reason to delete. -FrankTobia (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.