Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terra Universal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Terra Universal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Promotional tone as well. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as G11 actually applied because it's not only clear campaigning but a second mirrored attempt at it. SwisterTwister talk 18:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:CORP -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.