Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terese Svoboda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terese Svoboda[edit]

Delete author, one of whose books won a minor literary prize does not rise to the level of notability; fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO Carlossuarez46 (talk) 15:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A Google News Archive search turns up a San Francisco Chronicle article about her as well as dozens of reviews and announcements. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She has a ton of books, many of which with good reviews (NY Times Review of Books, etc.), besides the coverage noticed by the King, above. The article needs a good rewrite, but the writer herself is notable enough. Drmies (talk) 00:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject clearly meets WP:BIO based on coverage in the NY Times Review of Books alone. A stub in need of expansion, not deletion. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 02:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Expansion I've volunteered to do, assuming the article survives. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 20:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.