Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Orlowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nominator withdrew; no delete !votes are present. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Orlowski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all criteria outlined at WP:PORNBIO. No sources or refernces, merely one line of biography and a long list of films. Appears to be an open and shut case. Finnegas (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator I accept that the article now has numerous refernces to reliable independent sources such as Der Spiegel which satisfy WP:GNG. Finnegas (talk) 12:37, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Have you applied WP:BEFORE? PORNBIO does not affect general notability criteria, and I see several dozens of reliable sources available about her, both in Google News archives and in Google Books. I will add some of them shortly but remember that AfD is not cleanup. Cavarrone 23:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree with Cavarrone. Passes the GNG per [1][2][3] Finnegas, you seem to be deliberately targeting foreign porn actors for deletion without considering foreign sources. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing deliberate in my actions, the sole motivation is that the articles appear not to be notable. By foreign I presume you mean European? In addition, unfortunately the only Continental European language I have any knowledge of is French & I would be unable to establish what the source said and moreover the reliability & independence. Finnegas (talk) 12:37, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By foreign I mean non-English speaking. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.