Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple Turmeric

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temple Turmeric[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not credibly state WP:N, appears to be a bit too promotional. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please, I don't watch pages) 19:24, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- strictly promotional, with the hallmark of such promo articles -- discussion where the subject has been covered:

"The company and its products have been featured in publications that include Time, Crain's New York Business, Entrepreneur, and Yahoo!.[3]"

K.e.coffman (talk) 21:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 19:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.