Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telstar Logistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Telstar Logistics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried, but cannot locate anything that I would consider WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. There is a Make Magazine reference, but it looks more like dialogue between the magazine and the company founder as opposed to anything that would go towards WP:GNG. There are some promotional references out there, but the article does not reach WP:CORPDEPTH and therefore should be deleted. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Gimme a break! This "fictional company" is "an exercise in urban camouflage and commercial phenomenology. Originally created as a way to elude parking tickets." Wikipedia is not for something made up one day, not even a truck with a phony name painted on it to evade parking tickets. --MelanieN (talk) 23:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, subject has received passing mention in reliable sources, but none of those mentions are in-depth significant coverage of the subject, and thus the subject fails notability as defined by WP:GNG. I would also note that the article name is also used as a writer's pen name for someone on Wired, however that individual is not the subject of this AfD.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.